<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Opta on rostrum.blog</title>
    <link>https://www.rostrum.blog/tags/opta/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Opta on rostrum.blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="https://www.rostrum.blog/tags/opta/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Stiliyan Petrov: Jesus?</title>
      <link>https://www.rostrum.blog/2023/01/08/petrov/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.rostrum.blog/2023/01/08/petrov/</guid>
      <description>tl;dr In which I prove wrong a tweeted Opta football statistic, using R and Transfermarkt data. Oh wait, actually Opta were right. Ah, heck.
 Petrov Rescue Basically, for little reason, I dislike the style of the tweets on the Twitter feed for Opta1 (the company who do all the football stats).
What is so outrageous? Each tweet always ends in a single, summary word that makes me cringe.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>